Taxes

Suspending the Gas Tax Is a Mistake

Rising inflation has become a dominant issue for policymakers in the past year, with the most recent report finding inflation has risen 7.5 percent over the past 12 months. Some lawmakers have proposed suspending the gas tax to reduce inflation. Rising gas prices are certainly one piece of the inflation puzzle—but suspending the gas tax is a uniquely ill-suited policy for addressing rising prices.

The federal gas tax has been set at 18.4 cents per gallon of gasoline since 1993, and it remains the primary funding source for highway construction. In the context of recent increases in gas prices (almost $1 per gallon in the past 12 months), the federal gas tax of 18.4 cents is relatively small. And in real terms, the gas tax has lost almost half its value since its last adjustment in 1993 because it is not indexed for inflation.

Despite its declining value, the gas tax makes particular sense as the source of highway funding because it conforms to the user-pays principle. People who drive are also broadly the people who benefit most from roads, making the tax an efficient funding source. The rise of electric vehicles (EVs) makes the arrangement slightly less efficient, but EVs are currently only a small share of automobiles on the road.

The Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget recently estimated it would cost roughly $20 billion to suspend the federal gas tax from March to December 2022. That’s almost half of the $43 billion in total revenue the Congressional Budget Office expects the Highway Trust Fund to raise in the next year; the excise tax on diesel fuel would still be in effect as the proposal does not call for suspending it. Rising prices will mean highway maintenance becomes more costly, so cutting highway funding by nearly half at a time when costs are higher makes little sense.

In the context of the whole economy, reducing or eliminating the gas tax would exacerbate inflation. Currently, demand in the economy, boosted by expansionary fiscal and monetary policy, far outstrips supply, plagued with its own problems driven by the COVID-19 pandemic and its effects. Temporarily suspending the gas tax would be a much smaller program than, say, the American Rescue Plan (ARP) enacted last March, but it would have some shared design problems: providing more fiscal stimulus than the gap between the economy’s current position and its potential.

Nor would suspending the gas tax address the structural reasons for rising gas prices in particular. Gas prices have risen for a few simple reasons. As more Americans return to traveling and commuting, demand for gas has recovered to pre-pandemic levels. At the same time, domestic production has not returned to its 2019 heights, and international pressures have also reduced worldwide production. In short, demand has recovered, but supply hasn’t caught up yet—it takes time to drill for crude oil and refine it into motor fuel.

The savings from zeroing out the gas tax would likely be enjoyed at least in part by producers, rather than passed entirely to consumers. The bill, however, mandates “consumers immediately receive the benefit of the reduction in taxes.” The requirement is particularly unenforceable, but even if savings were passed to consumers in the form of lower gas prices, it could make the misalignment between demand and supply worse—reducing taxes on gasoline could spur further increased demand for gas, and in turn, higher prices. 

While the gas tax is in need of long-term reconsideration, my colleagues Ulrik Boesen and Karl Smith have argued the gas tax ought to be replaced by a vehicle miles traveled (VMT) tax.  Swapping the gas tax for a VMT tax is a far cry from turning the gas tax off for a year.

Expansionary fiscal policy is the wrong way to deal with inflation. If policymakers are looking to change the tax code to help fight inflation, they should pump the brakes on the gas tax holiday and instead consider structural reforms to raise the economy’s productive capacity in the long term.

Products You May Like

Articles You May Like

Smith & Wesson CEO faces backlash after he blamed politicians for gun violence
Changes are coming to improve student loan forgiveness for borrowers in public service
Homebuilders say U.S. is in a ‘housing recession’ as sentiment turns negative
Mortgage demand fell last week even as rates declined slightly
Walmart CEO Doug McMillon says even wealthier families are penny-pinching

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.